Wysiwyg Editor / discussion
started by: Automatic
on: 1210857095|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 3
rss icon RSS: new posts
This is the discussion related to the wiki page Wysiwyg Editor.
SocksSocks 1210892480|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

The code inserters at the top are more than a WYSIWYG editor often gives, and it's really easy to learn - and faster to use.

unfold by SocksSocks, 1210892480|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
maharajamaharaja 1214353000|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Why not make it optional? I.e. let the Site Administrator decide.

unfold by maharajamaharaja, 1214353000|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
yes if it is flexible, it would be a great plus
najasnajas 1214763393|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Have a look at the editor of wikispaces.com. Im not saying it couldn't improve anymore, but some things are indespensable, like auto saving drafts. Also the fact that the only thing that changes when you click edit is a floating bar at the top appears, and you can edit straight into the page which looks excactly like before. Im not good at describing. this is their sandbox. try it!

http://sandbox.wikispaces.com/

Have a look at the tables. see the menu you can use to add and remove stuff. I think if that is what you mean by wysiwyg, thumbs up. That is definitely more userfriendly than having tons of [[table]][[row]][[cell]]……………. If you have made and maintained a long table here at wikidot, you know what i mean.

He, i even have a bookmarklet that allows you to edit a site inplace ;) ok, it won't save the results on wikidot…

https://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/misc.html#edit_page

unfold yes if it is flexible, it would be a great plus by najasnajas, 1214763393|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
new post
Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 License.