I've been discussing the request to allow file:// with the developer on wikidot dev-list —
From: Erich <erich.steinbo…@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: New Feature: Colon Escape….
If you do so, please ask Michal, when touching the URL parser code, if he could add "file://" to the list of allowed schemes - should be pretty straightforward ..
'schemes' => array(
'http://',
'https://',
'ftp://',
'gopher://',
'news://',
'mailto:',
'mms://'
Two threads are requesting this …
http://community.wikidot.com/forum/t-30453/link-to-files-on-an-internal-lan
http://community.wikidot.com/forum/t-51361/recognition-of-file-links-on-local-network
Thx
From: Piotr Gabryjeluk <pi…@wikidev.lastlook.pl>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 21:19:32 +0200
Subject: Re: New Feature: Colon Escape….
I don't think this is a good idea. 1% of users will be happy, but 20% will be confused when linking to THEIR local files not being accessible by other users. We should not include this on Wikidot.com. Maybe this is a good option for some in-company Wikidot installation.
Regards
Piotr
From: Erich <erich.steinbo…@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 01:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: New Feature: Colon Escape….
I guess those people who'd like to add "file://" links to their wikis know what they are doing — and wouldn't confuse anyone.
Hey, you're supporting "gopher://" — who still knows what this? And who's actually using it?
http://community.wikidot.com/forum/t-30453/link-to-files-on-an-internal-lan :
"Our company keeps a lot of files on it's internal server and they are updated in these locations. I would like a way to access these or point to them via the wiki."
http://community.wikidot.com/forum/t-51361/recognition-of-file-links-on-local-network :
"Wikidot would be much more powerful for our private company wiki if file links would be recognized (so that I can link to documents/ folders on our company server)."
From: Piotr Gabryjeluk <pi…@wikidev.lastlook.pl>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 10:16:33 +0200
Subject: Re: New Feature: Colon Escape….
Hey, file:// is really not a good idea. It depends on ALL people using the wiki to have mounted the shared folders exactly the same way. They should provide a more standardized way to serve the files in addition to file://, (like http://) and use these links.
And that will be confusing for all the other people:
"Look! I can link to a file from my filesystem!"
"Hey, why is that not working for me?"
"This works for me!"
"It must be Wikidot broken!"
We don't want this.
As Wikidot is open source, we don't see a problem with them installing their own instance and allowing the file:// links if they REALLY need this.