A very good resource for learning CSS is W3Schools; it runs through many examples and has a complete list of rules that you can design. If you want to know some stuff about Wikidot's page structure (like how to change the color of the site title), you can visit The CSS Zone. That site is rather incomplete, but it does have some useful information and references.

A great place to practice CSS is the CSS Playground or the sandbox on the CSS Zone site. On those two locations, you can actually test your CSS code beforehand and see the results immediately.

All of these sites can help you design a good-looking theme for your site, and if you have specific questions, like how to add a good image to the header, we can help.

Who can I contact for creating a theme, or who can give me instructions for re-designing the look of this site.

Thanks in advance.

Regards.

If you find a theme that only needs minor adjustments to be perfect, we at the community will be happy to help.

It's complicated for me. Just want better look for this site.

Looks good - what do you want to change ?

Or - have you find it yourself and is the change done ?

…and still in the left place

:))
Hope this is the wished effect … if not:

Login-status left - as on our community here?

.. on page http://community.wikidot.com/css:theme2009 - have a look!

 /* LOGIN =============================*/ #login-status { -moz-border-radius-topleft: 20px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -webkit-border-top-left-radius: 20px; -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 20px; background-image: none; position: absolute; top: 10px; height: 20px; width: 250px; color: #004E0B; font-size: 90%; z-index: 6; margin: 0; left: 0px; top: 15px; overflow: visible; padding: 5px 0 0 15px; } #login-status ul a { color: #700; background: transparent; } 

I want to make it in left side

but in http://d3g0gp89917ko0.cloudfront.net/v--a32cab93a3c8/common--theme/base/css/style.css its in right place

and when I add it to my custom css file it is not take effect and still in the left place

any advices?

wondering why MS implements a different standard to everyone else

plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

There was one feature of the EOT specification that W3C thought was great: it included the font license in a machine-readable form. That would reduce piracy, which the font foundries were wary of, having been burned in the past.

That was the very feature that the other browser manufacturers would not accept.

imagine somebody implements EOT according to the standard. That means that the software looks in the EOT header for one or more URLs and does a string comparison of those URLs against the URLs of document it is about to render. If one of the URLs matches, the font can be used, otherwise not. Parsing the EOT header is a few dozen lines of code and the comparison itself is two lines.

Now imagine somebody else takes that software and removes the two lines that compare URLs. The result is a program that applies fonts in all cases, against the standard and, in some cases, against the licence of the font.

If you can find a judge who is willing to claim that those two lines constitute an effective DRM and that removing them is tantamount to circumventing it, then you can claim that the author of the original software is an accomplice, because he provided most of the code.

All hail the DMCA.

The W3C is now developing a font specification without a machine-readable license.

Read the full story here.