Comments for page "Add a Custom Google Search Engine"

Re: What about "private" sites?

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:58:10 +0000

Not yet… under "private" sites there is no way to do that…

Re: What about "private" sites?

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:31:55 +0000

are there any alternatives for this? i'm in the same boat and am looking for a better search module for a private wiki site as the current one is not very useful unfortunately…thanks!

Re: What about "private" sites?

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:19:12 +0000

Thanks a lot for your early reply Rob! I will waiting for improvements in Wikidot search module instead…

Re: What about "private" sites?

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:57:16 +0000

No there isn't. Your site is private and although the Google custom search code is put on your page in the site the search is still an external public search. As you are not able to provide any authentication it has no access to your site so can't do the search and returns nothing found.

What about "private" sites?

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:36:06 +0000

I am trying to use the search engine in my private wiki, but it shows no results, I verified at Google´s control panel and it seems there is a problem with the indexing process… I suppose this is because my site is private, so I wish to know if, Is there any way to get Google indexing my private site?

Thanks!

custom search box for uploaded files

Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:04:49 +0000

Hi there, for some time I've been attempting to feature a custom search facility to allow searches to be undertaken for uploaded image/file content on my wiki alone.

I've tried option three above which worked great, only it simply took me to the main google page. So I then replaced:

(no title)

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:16:17 +0000

Bingo! Exactly spot on!

(no title)

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:14:15 +0000

So you will be able to embed HTML in Wikidot pages? It will be on another domain so it will be secure, but this will be transparent to the user, just use HTML tags and Wikidot takes care of the rest.

(no title)

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:36:34 +0000

HTML used on a different domain/website does no harm to anybody. Even if you iframe it on your website, it still can't do any harm.

But in theory, if you actually place the HTML code as part of your Wikidot webpage (which isn't possible to do, nor will it ever be possible to do, we are just talking hypothetically here), it can do the following:

Create/Edit/Delete/Rename/Parent/Tag/Upload Files of Wikidot pages
Modify the user's account settings (possibly changing password/email)
Change what the person is viewing

It would not be able to:

Change the Wikidot Engine

Essentially, it would be able to do what a normal user can do with Wikidot — albeit, automated.

Like I said, it's not possible and never will be :-)

(no title)

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:13:54 +0000

http://community.wikidot.com/forum/t-20340/rich-text-html

In the topics I made there I was told HTML is not used to stop malicious code. By that does it mean code malicious to Wikidot, or malicious to the person viewing the site?

Re: Security Risk?

Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:57:59 +0000

Well, all web browsers have inbuilt security which prevents a webpage from controlling a different webpage in your browser.

If you create code on Wikidot.com, then you can use it to control Wikidot.com. However, if you create code on Google.com, you will not be able to control Wikidot.com with it. Google code can only control the Google website. Wikidot code can only control the Wikidot website.

So the HTML module will put your code on a different website so that it can't control Wikidot.com. Does this make more sense now?

(no title)

Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:49:31 +0000

What do you mean? How is that so?

Re: Security risk?

Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:51:08 +0000

Not if it is iframed on a different domain. That is what the planned HTML block will do.

Security risk?

Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:23:59 +0000

Wouldn't allowing HTML be a security risk?

Re: [[html]]

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:26:22 +0000

Rhombus, you should never need to log out and back in to get a codeblock to work. It just needs the browser cache clearing then a refresh. So on Firefox it's ctrl+shift+delete then in the details section of the popup window make sure the cache (only) is checked, then click OK. Then ctrl+r to refresh.

Re: [[html]]

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:58:30 +0000

Uh… since when do you need to log out to get iframed html to work? :S

Am I misunderstanding something here.. ?

Re: [[html]]

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:34:35 +0000

Rob's patience is legendary. We're planning a new tag, [[html]] that will make this work instantly.

so no more logging out and logging back in to get html to work? that would be sweet!

[[html]]

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:18:59 +0000

We're planning a new tag, [[html]] that will make this work instantly.

You probably already know this, and it's probably the reason you are planning the tag, but just so I'm on the record, that sounds fantastic.

(no title)

Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:51:29 +0000

I think RobElliott spends 3/4 of his time responding to "How do I embed xxx?" and the answer is always about the same.

Rob's patience is legendary. We're planning a new tag, [[html]] that will make this work instantly.

(no title)

Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:26:32 +0000

Anyways, thank you for your quick help…

You're welcome. Sometimes it works out that way. I was posting responses almost as fast as you were asking questions! :)